"Springsteen used to write about people he knew, now he writes about people he reads about."
I can't remember the exact source of this quote but it was one of Bill Simmons' friends. I wish I could give the name since I truly believe ultimate credit is due. There is more truth in that quote then most people will ever realize. Springsteen made his bones singing songs about guys he grew up with. Working class, Jersey guys. Even with Nebraska, he was writing songs from a perspective that he understood, even if he didn't know the actual people. He still thinks he's that guy, and that's the problem. He hasn't been that guy in at least 25 years. He could still make good music in the 80's by remembering what it was like, but he's been removed from normal life for so long that he just can't do it anymore.
I bring this up for this reason. People, and I even include myself in this, lend way too much credence to what people with a mic or a camera perpetually attatched to them have to say. Dylan has influenced my life almost as much as anyone I actually know. Springsteen, Neil Young, Clint Eastwood, George Carlin, Lenny Bruce, Steinbeck, Kerouac, "The Dead Poet's Society", "Good Will Hunting", hell, even "Tombstone" have all had a fairly dramatic impact on my life and how I view things. It bugs me to some degree, but there's no point in lying about it.
However, I can say, whole-heartedly, that every bit of impact any of them have had is based on the art created and not in what they have to say in real life. With the notable exceptions of those who the one is completely based on the other (Bruce & Kerouac, mostly). I still love Pearl Jam's first few albums, but there's no way in hell I'll pay to see them live at this point. The last thing I need is to drop $50 to listen to the Vedder Monologues. I love Minor Threat and Fugazi, but if I had to hang out with Ian McKaye for any extended period of time, I'm pretty sure I'd kill one of us. Matt Damon has made a couple of my favorite movies, but even the idea of listening to him talk about politics makes me need a drink.
What prompts this whole diatribe is "The People Speak". It's a very well done History Channel special where a bunch of mostly famous people read other people's words about other people's lives. It is blatantly and unapologetically slanted to the left. It's essentially a commercial for socialism. There isn't a single opposing view in the whole thing. And I'm ok with that. It's entertainment, nobody said it has to be unbiased. But it just reminded me of all the things I hate about celebrity activisim. Vedder commiting the sin of covering Dylan, and badly. Springsteen singing a Guthrie song. Damon reading the Joad monologue from "Of Mice and Men". At least when Dylan covered Woody it made sense. He started out as a Woody clone. Plus, Dylan has always been the king of leaving it in the song. He doesn't spout off anytime someone gives him the chance like most of the rest of them do.
I'm amazed Paul David Hewson didn't find some way to muscle in on the thing, but from what I could tell, they were all American citizens. So that much was good.
Lastly, the meaning of the title of the post is this: Does Matt Damon really think he's worthy of Steinbeck? Steinbeck actually lived, purposely, what he wrote about. He traveled the country during the depression to write his books. That alone is enough for me to put him above his contemporaries. I have learned to accept that Hemmingway was actually a good writer and Fitzgerald was one of the greats, but neither of them (or any of the rest of the Lost Generation, for that matter) were on Steinbeck's level. Matt Damon is just a good actor and sometimes screenwriter. That's it. That's all.
Steinbeck lived it. Guthrie, Langston Hughes, Mohammed Ali, Malcom X, Caesar Chavez, Susan B. Anthony, John Brown and everybody else that got quoted in this thing actually lived it. I'll listen to them. But if Damon or Strathairn or Vedder or any of them think that they belong in the same sentence, then they're kidding themselves.
That is all.